"And now Iran says it will introduce a new oil market, calibrated in euros rather than dollars. Some people think this marks the beginning of the end for the dollar. Others think it marks the beginning of the end of civilization; the United States will use nuclear weapons if necessary, they say, to prevent Iran from selling oil in euros.
The U.S. invaded Iraq not to turn the desert tribes into Democrats, the argument goes, but to stop Saddam Hussein from pricing oil in euros. Oil is quoted in dollars. Since the entire world is forced to buy oil, it must exchange local currencies for dollars to do so. This is the real source of America’s imperial finance: it exchanges dollars at par, and then gradually devalues them by diluting the world’s supply with more."by William Clark
Similar to the Iraq war, military operations against Iran relate to
the
macroeconomics of ‘petrodollar recycling’ and the unpublicized but real
challenge to U.S. dollar supremacy from the euro as an alternative oil
transaction currency.
It is now obvious the invasion of Iraq had less to do with any threat
from Saddam’s long-gone WMD program and certainly less to do to do with
fighting International terrorism than it has to do with gaining
strategic control over Iraq’s hydrocarbon reserves and in doing so
maintain the U.S. dollar as the monopoly currency for the critical
international oil market. Throughout 2004 information provided by
former administration insiders revealed the Bush/Cheney administration
entered into office with the intention of toppling Saddam
Hussein.[1][2]
.....................................
Concerning Iran, recent articles have revealed active Pentagon
planning
for operations against its suspected nuclear facilities. While the
publicly stated reasons for any such overt action will be premised as a
consequence of Iran's nuclear ambitions, there are again
unspoken
macroeconomic drivers [I
guess the reason these 'drivers' are never mentioned in the mainstream
press would be an implicit (or in a few cases explicit) understanding
that if we admit we're attacking Iraq and Iran to defend the dollar and
our empire,
that admission itself could hasten or cause the collapse of the dollar.]
underlying the second stage of petrodollar
warfare – Iran's upcoming oil bourse. (The word bourse refers to a
stock exchange for securities trading, and is derived from the French
stock exchange in Paris, the Federation Internationale des Bourses de
Valeurs.)
In essence, Iran is about to
commit a far greater “offense” than Saddam
Hussein's conversion to the euro for Iraq’s oil exports in the fall of
2000. Beginning in March 2006, the Tehran government has plans
to begin
competing with New York's NYMEX and London's IPE with respect to
international oil trades – using a euro-based international oil-trading
mechanism.[7]
The proposed Iranian oil bourse signifies that without some sort of US
intervention, the euro is going to establish a firm foothold in the
international oil trade. Given U.S. debt levels..................
|
||
Iran
continues to push its weight around. Now it proposes to begin pricing
oil in euros. Unfortunately, just about everyone would benefit—except
the United States. For half a century, the American dollar has been the reserve currency of the world. Seventy percent of all currency reserves are in American dollars. This has a lot to do with the fact that oil, the most important commodity traded in the world, is mostly priced in U.S. dollars. The majority of countries, being oil importers, have to buy their oil in U.S. dollars. This, together with related economic considerations, encourages them keep most of their foreign currency in dollars. The debt-burdened U.S. economy is dependent upon this high demand for its currency in order to remain afloat. The day this demand comes to end will portend disaster for the American economy. There is a move underway, however, to effect just such a reversal of the dollar’s fortunes. In particular, the world’s second-largest producer of crude oil—and declared enemy of the United States—Iran, seeks to end the predominance of America’s currency. Several weeks ago, Tehran reconfirmed that it plans to create a euro-based exchange in oil—to compete with the London and New York dollar-denominated oil exchanges, both American-owned. The proposed March 2006 launch of the Iranian oil bourse (IOB), if successful, would give the euro a foothold in the international oil trade, solidifying its status as an alternative oil transaction currency. This, in turn, could be a catalyst for a major currency flight from the dollar to the euro—and a disaster for America. The IOB will see crude oil, petrochemicals and other commodities of the same kind traded in euros. Iran no doubt has multiple motives for making this move. For one, it makes sense economically, especially since the European Union is Iran’s biggest trading partner. But more importantly, it would strike a blow to Iran’s archenemy America—and, by hoping to make Iran the main hub for oil deals in the region, help drive the Islamic Republic forward in its quest for regional supremacy. George Perkovich, an Iran expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, stated it frankly: “It’s part of a very intelligent, creative Iranian strategy—to go on the offense in every way possible and mobilize other actors against the U.S.” (Christian Science Monitor, August 30). Iran is eager to eliminate American influence. For Iran, which foresees a “clash of civilizations” between Islam and America—which holds the banner for the West—undermining the dollar could prove to be its best and most effective strike against a more capable military foe. Asia Times reported that only one major actor stands to lose if oil-trading in euros takes hold: the U.S. By contrast, “Oil in euros would benefit millions … in the EU and its trading partners …. And it would loosen the grip the U.S. has on opec members” (August 26). “One of the Federal Reserve’s nightmares may begin to unfold in the spring of 2006,” one expert on the subject stated, “when it appears that international buyers will have a choice of buying a barrel of oil for $60 on the nymex [New York Mercantile Exchange] and ipe [London’s International Petroleum Exchange] or purchase a barrel of oil for €45 to €50 via the Iranian bourse” (Global Politician, September 2). If oil-trading in euros were to get going, the already-existent global trend of foreign currency reserves being shifted from dollars to euros would rapidly accelerate. In turn, “countries switching to euro reserves from dollar reserves would bring down the value of the U.S. currency. Imports would start to cost Americans a lot more …. As countries and businesses converted their dollar assets into euro assets, the U.S. property and stock market bubbles would, without doubt, burst” (The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability, Nov. 15, 2004). The snowballing effect of a reserve currency switch would be catastrophic for the U.S., according to the Global Politician. The U.S. “would simply have to stop importing” (op. cit.). Considering America’s industrial and agricultural heartland has been gutted over the last half century, this possibility could be grave. As one commentator put it, the impact of the Iran oil bourse on the U.S. dollar—and the follow-on effect on the U.S. economy—could be worse than Iran launching a “direct nuclear attack.” Should Iran’s planned euro-based oil-trading mechanism get off the ground and gain international popularity, the U.S. dollar will weaken and the euro strengthen—helping to hasten the economic decline of the U.S. and propelling the European Union into dominance. Though many economists consider the chances of Iran’s ambitions being successful as remote, we can know from Bible prophecy that the U.S. financial system will be brought down—along with the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency. |
Strategic Insights is a monthly electronic journal produced by the Center for Contemporary Conflict at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. The views expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of NPS, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.
Click here for a PDF version of this article.
.........................................